Responsibility without authority is not a safety system. It is a liability transfer.
On a high-volume resort boat or liveaboard, the pressure to deliver the promised experience can be enormous. Guests may have invested substantial money and vacation time to dive a particular site or encounter a specific animal. The crew knows that changing the plan may result in complaints, refund requests, poor reviews, or reduced gratuities. Those pressures are real, but they cannot be allowed to influence the safety calculation.
So the question remains: How do we create a culture in which dive staff can say no without fear of repercussions? That is a serious and reasonable question, especially in high-volume operations.
Last month, my “Standards vs. Judgment” article drew some criticism on social media. The primary concern was that many businesses would penalize a staff member for turning away a customer or calling a dive. Having worked in some of the largest, high-volume dive operations in the Western Hemisphere, I believe that concern is real. No one wants to refund a guest or lose a tip because a staff member had to say no. Yet that culture of support must exist. Otherwise, the entire business may be placed in jeopardy through legal action.
Here are several management practices every dive business that provides instruction or excursions should consider:
Establish a stop-work authority: Every instructor, divemaster, captain, and crew member should know they may raise a concern and pause an activity without fearing immediate punishment.
Require a clear explanation: The professional making the call should explain the concern, whether it involves conditions, diver behavior, equipment, staffing, fatigue, medical issues, or changes from the original plan.
Review decisions after the immediate risk has passed: The dock, dive platform, or water entry is not the place for an argument about revenue. Stabilize the situation first and review the decision afterward.
Paid Advertisement
Separate the safety review from the customer-service response: Management should handle complaints, credits, alternative activities, and schedule changes. An instructor should not be pressured to reverse a safety decision merely to avoid an uncomfortable conversation with a guest.
Look for patterns, not a single conservative decision: A single conservative decision should not define an employee negatively. Repeated decisions can be reviewed for possible training needs, confidence issues, planning concerns, or performance problems.
Reward early reporting: Employees should be encouraged to raise concerns before a situation becomes an emergency. A professional who identifies a developing problem early may save the operation far more than the cost of one canceled dive.
We need to encourage a culture in which individual responsibility for others’ safety is a primary function of your dive staff. After all, until we can breathe water, aren’t we all in the business of managing risk in the water?
Paid Advertisement
Click here to read this article on our Flippingbook platform.
More from This Issue:
THIS MONTH’S ADVERTISING PARTNERS
