Designing Demand: Is Your Website Helping or Hurting? By Burcu Mahmutoğlu

This Issue’s Table of Contents
category: Business EDU (8 min read)

Is your website your best employee or the one on the way out the door?

By Burcu Mahmutoğlu, PADI IDC Staff Instructor, Dive Cypria, Cypru

Click here to read this article on our Flippingbook platform.

IWHEN I FIRST DESIGNED the website for my dive centre, I gave it a conventional job: explain who we were, show what we offered, establish trust and encourage people to contact us. It worked. People found us, enquiries arrived and enquiries became bookings. After four seasons of largely running a busy dive centre solo, however, I realized that generating enquiries wasn’t enough. My website was creating work for the business, but it wasn’t doing enough work for the business.

I came into diving with an extensive professional background in communications, so audience, messaging and information design weren’t new concepts. Running a dive centre added a practical consideration: every piece of communication consumes somebody’s time. During high season, the person answering an enquiry may also be preparing equipment, moving cylinders, teaching students, guiding divers and organizing tomorrow’s schedule.

Time had become one of my most finite resources, and my expertise was needed elsewhere. I stopped asking only, “How do I generate more enquiries?” and started asking, “What kind of demand do I want to generate, and how much of my time should somebody need before deciding to book?”

Designing the demand you actually want: Every benefit we promote creates demand for us to fulfil it. At my own centre, we deliberately focus on recreational diving. Our equipment, training and operating standards have been built particularly around recreational divers, beginners, families, women and children. We offer recreational Nitrox diving, but not decompression diving or serious technical wreck penetration.

That doesn’t exclude technical divers. A technical diver wanting a recreational holiday dive can be an excellent customer. Someone specifically searching for a technical operation, however, isn’t a customer I need to spend marketing resources trying to acquire. Another operator may have invested heavily in that market and should absolutely design demand around it.

The same principle applies to smaller decisions. During my first season, I enthusiastically promoted local transfers. Customers liked them, but they also turned the person preparing equipment, teaching courses and running the business into a morning shuttle service. We can still help when somebody genuinely needs transport, but I no longer deliberately create demand around it.

There is no universal correct answer. Marketing should create more demand for the strengths and services we have intentionally built into our own operations.

Paid Advertisement

Give customers evidence: Designing demand can also reach people who might otherwise never become customers. Many people perfectly capable of learning to dive may still feel uncomfortable walking into an unfamiliar dive shop and asking strangers to teach them a completely unfamiliar skill. They may wonder whether they are too nervous, whether they are too old, whether their child will be comfortable or simply whether people like them belong there.

Our digital presence can answer some of those questions before we know they were asked.

This is why I am suspicious of marketing adjectives. “Experienced instructors,” “professional service,” “personal attention” and “family friendly” tell customers what we want them to believe. Training backgrounds, years in the industry, student numbers, genuine reviews, real photographs and previous customer experiences allow them to decide for themselves.

I was reminded of this while reviewing another operator’s website. Our own website described our diving as taking place in “small groups.” The other operator stated “3–4 divers.” Their communication was better. I know what “small” means because I run my operation. A customer doesn’t. “Small” is marketing language; “3–4” is information.

Paid Advertisement

Why are they still asking? My first attempt to reclaim time focused on answering enquiries faster. The rapid development of generative AI made automated replies an obvious experiment, but I disliked how easily efficiency became generic and impersonal. I moved instead to personalized AI-assisted replies. The communication improved and I typed less, but I was still providing context, checking answers, customizing them and sending them.

Eventually I noticed something more important than the technology: the questions were predictable. Is equipment included? Can my child dive? Which program should I choose? I haven’t dived recently; what should I book? How long does it take? Where do we meet? What does the price include?

I had been trying to answer repetitive questions more efficiently when I should also have been asking why customers needed to ask them.

That changed the brief for our website redesign. I wanted our digital communication to perform four jobs before personal communication became necessary: attract, reassure, qualify and convert.

Attract the customers the operation is designed to serve. Reassure them with evidence rather than claims. Give them enough information to qualify whether the service matches their needs. If it does, make conversion possible without requiring a phone call simply to obtain basic information.

Qualification matters because not every prevented enquiry represents a lost sale. If someone looking for serious technical diving understands that we are a recreational operation and chooses another centre, the communication worked.

Paid Advertisement

Operators know too much

One difficulty is that we read our own communication with institutional knowledge. During one website rebuild, a typo turned “message us” into “massage us.” Nobody arrived expecting a spa treatment, fortunately, but it illustrated how easily our brains correct information when we already know what it is supposed to mean.

The same happens with more important details. We know what “small groups” means, which certification is required, what’s included and which program a beginner should choose. Customers don’t.

During another website review, I encountered an operator legitimately offering programs through more than one training system, but the customer journey moved between them without clearly explaining which program a beginner was considering. An industry professional understands equivalent program and multiple affiliations. A first-time customer shouldn’t need industry knowledge to understand what they are buying.

Better enquiries, not no enquiries

None of this means eliminating human communication. Some questions should reach a dive professional. A parent with a concern specific to their child deserves a conversation. A nervous beginner may need personal reassurance. A diver with an unusual training history may require professional judgement.

I want to reduce the questions that consume human time without requiring human expertise. If customers repeatedly ask the same question, I no longer look only for a faster answer. I ask why they still need to ask it.

Digital information can handle what is predictable. Reusable reply systems can make predictable but personal communication faster. Human attention can then be reserved for situations where it adds value. The objective isn’t to remove the human from the customer journey; it is to protect the time required for the human part.

Paid Advertisement

We don’t need to be everywhere

The platforms through which customers discover us will continue to change. Trying to occupy every platform with individually designed content can quickly turn a dive-centre owner into a full-time digital content producer.

We don’t need to be everywhere, but we do need to take responsibility for every message we put out there. Whether someone encounters us through a website, social media, reviews, search or a booking platform, each message creates an expectation. If we heavily promote a service, we should be prepared for customers to request it more often. If we claim a strength, we should be able to demonstrate it.

The medium will change. Our responsibility for the expectations we create doesn’t.

One of the simplest ways to test this doesn’t require new software. Look at your recent enquiries. Which questions keep appearing? Which genuinely required your expertise, and which could have been answered before contact? Look at the claims in your digital communication and ask how many are supported by evidence rather than adjectives. Then consider whether the customers those messages attract match the operation you have actually built.

After four seasons, I stopped judging my website primarily by whether it looked good or generated enquiries. I started asking whether it was carrying its share of the workload.

For me, that is designing demand: helping more of the right people recognize that we can serve them, giving them enough evidence to trust that promise and answering enough predictable questions that contacting us isn’t a prerequisite for understanding what we sell. There will always be questions, and there should be. I simply want the questions that reach me during high season to be the ones where my experience and human attention can actually make a difference.